Effects of prior concentric training on eccentric exercise induced muscle damage
by
Gleeson N, Eston R, Marginson V, McHugh M.
—
last modified
2009-10-09 15:16
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Apr;37(2):119-25; discussion 125.
BACKGROUND: Exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) from strenuous unaccustomed
eccentric exercise is well documented. So too is the observation that a prior
bout of eccentric exercise reduces the severity of symptoms of EIMD. This has
been attributed to an increase in sarcomeres in series. Recent studies have
suggested that prior concentric training increases the susceptibility of muscle
to EIMD following eccentric exercise. This has been attributed to a reduction of
sarcomeres in series, which decreases muscle compliance and changes the
length-tension relation of muscle contraction. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects
of prior concentric training on the severity of EIMD. METHODS: Four men and four
women (mean (SD) age 21.1 (0.8) years) followed a four week concentric training
programme. The elbow flexor musculature of the non-dominant arm was trained at
60% of one repetition maximum dynamic concentric strength performance, three
times a week, increasing to 70% by week 3. After three days of rest, participants
performed 50 maximal isokinetic eccentric contractions on both arms. All
participants gave written informed consent before taking part in this study,
which was approved by the school ethics committee. Strength, relaxed arm angle
(RAA), arm circumference, and soreness on active extension and flexion were
recorded immediately before eccentric exercise, one hour after, and at 24 hour
intervals for three days. Data were analysed with fully repeated measures
analyses of variance. RESULTS: Strength retention was significantly (p<0.01)
greater in the control arm than the trained arm (84.0 (13.7)%, 90.4 (14.7)%, 95.2
(10.5)%, 103.5 (7.6)% v 75.5 (11.3)%, 77.6 (15.3)%, 80.1 (13.9)%, 80.9 (12.5)%)
at one, 24, 48, and 72 hours respectively. Similarly, soreness was greater in the
trained arm (0.7 (0.6), 3.1 (1.4), 3.0 (1.5), 1.9 (2.3)) than in the untrained
arm (0 (0.2), 1.6 (1.3), 1.4 (0.6), 0.6 (0.4)) at one, 24, 48, and 72 hours
respectively (p<0.05). Concentric training induced a significant reduction in RAA
(165.2 (6.7) degrees v 157.3 (4.9) degrees ) before the eccentric exercise bout
(p<0.01). This was further reduced and remained lower in the trained arm at all
time points after the eccentric exercise (p<0.01). The arm circumference of the
concentrically trained arm was significantly greater than baseline (p<0.05) at 72
hours (30.3 (2.9) v 29.8 (3.3) cm). CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend the
understanding of the effects of prior concentric training in increasing the
severity of EIMD to an upper limb exercise model. The inclusion of concentric
conditioning in rehabilitation programmes tends to exacerbate the severity of
EIMD in subsequent unaccustomed exercise. However, where concentric conditioning
is indicated clinically, the net effect of conditioning outcome and EIMD may
still confer enhanced strength performance and capability to dynamically
stabilise a joint system.